From Balkunin to Bloodline
Balkunin is very concerned with ethical epistemology. Wherefrom Right was derived and its ownership (by the people) stand as core to his questions. The only kind of right is a natural break, which is itself a delicate shroud of one’s residence and accordance with natural law. The actions one takes in consonance with natural law verify, and are the only true identification with authority. False laws and false activities have the resolution in human times, whereas the structures of natural law live perpetually like maxims, colloquialisms in the line of common sense that weaves legislation. Such identification of natural law characterizes an individual’s ability to recognize any ideas present with, and natural to, social systems. The practice of legislation then becomes a process of refining and filtering our sensation and awareness of natural law through the documentation of any ideas. Societies can rise and fall, but the words refined through their governance can live millennia after the people have transformed into new cultures, with new technologies. Though, the inheritance of refined realization of natural law does not preclude nor rely upon the inheritance of ‘Just’ thinking (by standards of natural law) within specific individuals and their descendants. The capacity for recognition of natural law being itself genetic each individual takes control of their ability to render their own character and it’s ultimate relationship to natural and social order. No guarantee of an inheritance or right in any social line, or ‘order’, comes from natural - but neither nature preclude it. Moreover, consideration may uplift the notion that Leadership itself can have hereditary qualities regardless of societal position.
